The 10-person unicorn
If the next hire isn't human, what are we actually underwriting at pre-seed and seed: the team, distribution, data, or speed?
From the agenda: "The 10-Person Unicorn: Who Builds It First?" · Wed 10:15
The storm may have closed the venue. It hasn't closed the conversation. A group of investors is taking over a room in Lisbon for one honest, unscripted day: you pitch the topics, the room picks them, small groups dig in, and everyone reports back.
Not a conference hall. A room full of people who write cheques, talking about what they actually think.
Three days of panels can tell you what people say on stage. This is the other part: the conversation after the panel, with the people who were in the audience.
It runs as an unconference. Nobody is booked to speak. Anyone can pitch a topic in sixty seconds, the room votes, and the board becomes the day. We work in small groups, then each group gives the whole room five minutes: what we concluded, where we disagreed, and what we'd do differently on Monday.
Sixty seconds, one card. A question you're wrestling with, not your fund or your portfolio.
Three dots each. The most wanted topics become the board: three rounds of parallel groups.
Five to eight people, sixty minutes, one scribe, one presenter. Move groups whenever you like.
Every group reports back: conclusion, disagreements, three takeaways, one open question.
Taken from Web Summit's own programme, most of them scheduled for Wednesday. They're on the wall when you arrive. Pick them, merge them, or pitch something better.
If the next hire isn't human, what are we actually underwriting at pre-seed and seed: the team, distribution, data, or speed?
From the agenda: "The 10-Person Unicorn: Who Builds It First?" · Wed 10:15
Which AI companies get better when the model gets better, and which get eaten? Is AI flattening the market or concentrating it?
From the agenda: "Is AI flattening the tech market or concentrating it?" · Wed 14:40 · "Rethinking risk, moats, and value in VC" · Tue
Exits take longer and LPs want cash back. Secondaries, continuation funds, earlier M&A: what's working, and what does it mean for angels?
From the agenda: "Where capital is flowing in 2026, and why" · Wed 13:45 · "Your exit starts now" · Tue
Robotics, chips and industrial AI need capex that venture can't fund alone. Debt, grants, sovereign money, customers as financiers: who funds Europe's hard tech?
From the agenda: "Capital beyond equity" · Wed 14:45 · "Putting the silicon back in Silicon Valley" · Wed 13:30
Syndicates, community funds and angel networks: how do individual investors get access, share diligence and stay disciplined?
From the agenda: "Community-driven investments meetup" · Wed 13:30 · "Redefining what is investable" · Wed 14:00
What industries don't exist yet but will by 2030, and how do you back a market before it has a name?
From the agenda: "Investing in zero billion dollar markets" · Wed 10:50
Founders, not this time. We love you, and that's why there are no pitches today. Places are limited by the room, so sign-up asks which fund or network you invest through.
The hosts will message everyone who signed up on Luma before 08:30 on Wednesday to say whether we're still on.
One question you'd like a room of investors to help you think through. That's your topic pitch, if you want to give one. Pitching is optional; joining is not.
Yes, but be there at 10:45 if you can: the topic market decides the day. The read-outs from 16:20 are the other part worth not missing.
No. Chatham House rule. The groups' one-page read-outs are shared with attendees afterwards, without names.
If they're an investor, ask them to sign up on Luma too. Places are limited, so every guest needs their own sign-up.
Sign-up runs on Luma. The hosts confirm guests to keep the room investors only.
The Luma link opens shortly. Check back, or ask the hosts in the investors' WhatsApp group.